tracking · reporting · measurement

The difference between tracking and reporting

Tracking records what happened; reporting is what someone chooses to show you. How the gap between them eats ad budgets.

An owner I worked with last year fired an agency after eight months. The reports looked good. The phone did not ring.

The tracking was fine. The reporting was a selection.

Every event was firing. The problem was which events made it into the summary. The summary highlighted impressions and click-through rate. It omitted that close rate and revenue per customer had never been measured at all.

Tracking is a feed

Tracking is the raw feed. Every call, every form, every direction request, every chat. It belongs in the background of a system, uncensored.

Reporting is a decision

Reporting takes that feed and decides what matters. It filters out the noise, and it can filter out the accountability at the same time.

A good report answers:

  • What did we spend
  • Against what did it land
  • Which of those turned into work with dates on the calendar
  • What happens next

Any report that cannot answer those four is not a report. It is a brochure.

The tell

Ask whoever produces your reports one question: what would you show me if the numbers were bad this month. If the answer is vague, the reporting is not choosing the truth.

I count conservatively. Every untracked job is your upside, not my credit.

Start here

Three numbers are enough to start.

  1. What the last marketing attempt cost, all-in
  2. What a booked job is usually worth
  3. How many jobs you can take on now

Send what you have. A missing number is not a blocker, working it out is part of the audit. No contracts, ever. I reply within 12 hours.

Send the numbers

What is happening with your advertising?

Spend, leads, and what you suspect is going wrong. I reply within 12 hours.

No contracts. I reply within 12 hours.

Start with a number